Long Field
By A.J.R.
Harris
And
a long field it is, considerably over a century in length, even
when we look no further back than the first known published
reports of cricket matches played at Hethersett. An animated
scene it is too, liberally dotted with the figures of those who
played out the story we attempt to read. Butchers, brickmakers,
blacksmith, farmers and farm workers, parsons and publicans,
tailors and thatchers, squires and shopkeepers; all those, among
others, feature in that story. Although distance in time
precludes ready recognition of the more remote figures, we do at
least know their names and what they accomplished in the game of
cricket. There in the distance are H and A Bloomfield, the
former capable of knocking up a century, the latter a formidable
bowler, besides being a good batsman. There also are the three
Guntons who were almost a cricket team on their own! The Moores,
the Childs and the Danns are there too, together with many
another Hethersett cricketer of whom we shall now learn more as
our story assumes clearer outline in the year 1866.
Appropriately enough, the first
match of which we have published record was one played against
Wymondham at Wymondham on a long ago summer's day which proved
to be a cold one. Alas, however, although we have a report of
the match and know that Hethersett won it, the scoresheets were
not published.
Norwich Mercury: July 28th, 1866
WYMONDHAM v HETHERSETT
On Tuesday last a match was
played on Wymondham ground between the above clubs, resulting in
a victory for Hethersett. The day was cold, though not
unfavourable for the sport and a large company of the elite of
the town were assembled to witness the game. The first innings
of Wymondham produced the respectable score of 97, the neat play
of Cleveland contributing 35 runs thereto. However the
Hethersett club went at their work, the close of their innings
showed what pluck can do, for it placed them 16 ahead,
Bloomfield adding 35 to this. The fielding of Hethersett was
admired though the long grass much incommoded them; but the
bowling was the weakest pont for Wymondham as that was not as
good as usual for them. Mr Mobbs catered in his excellent
manner, and the two clubs seemed to be equally matched at the
table as on the turf.
From the above we may deduce some
illuminating facts. Wymondham for instance was clearly an
already established club. Moreover since the "elite of the
town" attended and a professional caterer provided
refreshments, we may assume that a cricket match was something
of a social as well as sporting occasion. That Hethersett's
admirable fielding was "much incommoded by the long
grass," we may well believe that they were not accustomed
to such conditions on their home ground. George Moore saw to
that! And when the return match was played at Hethersett a
week later, the home team won by an innings and 42 runs - the
score reading
Hethersett 97, Wymondham 27
and 28
In fact all four of Hethersett's
reported matches for that season were wins for the club, the
others being:
August 1866: Hethersett 100,
Costessey 96
October 1866: Hethersett 84,
Nelson Club Norwich 53 and 21.
The season of 1867 presents a
more checkered story. What must have been the first match of the
season warranted the following report:
Norwich Mercury: April 15th, 1867
HETHERSETT v ASSOCIATION
A match between the above
clubs was played on Tuesday last in the beautiful grounds
belonging to Henry Back Esq at Hethersett, and after a very
interesting game, the Association was declared the winners on
the first innings by 56 runs; in the second innings of the
Association only 3 wickets fell i.e Berry 3, Wodehouse 2, Cole
0; Williams not out 5; byes 1. The following is the score.
Norwich Association
| Croxford |
|
b
Bligh |
11 |
| Cole |
c
Dowson |
b
Bligh |
0 |
| Isbell |
|
b
Bligh |
8 |
| Massingham |
c
Reynolds |
b
W. Gunton |
13 |
| Banham |
|
b
F. Gunton |
29 |
| Sewell |
|
b
F. Gunton |
23 |
| Williams |
c
Porrett |
b
Bligh |
5 |
| Thompson |
lbw |
b
W. Gunton |
0 |
| Wodehouse |
lbw |
|
0 |
| A.
Berry |
Not |
Out |
21 |
| Shalders |
|
b
Bloomfield |
2 |
|
Extras |
|
|
27 |
| Total |
|
|
139 |
Hethersett
| Reynolds |
Run |
Out |
1 |
| Dawson |
|
b
Cole |
1 |
| Bligh |
c
Thompson |
b
Cole |
0 |
| W.
Gunton |
|
b
Cole |
9 |
| F.
Gunton |
|
b
Thompson |
39 |
| Bloomfield |
c
Sewell |
|
0 |
| Turner |
|
b
Cole |
0 |
| Rotherham |
c
Isbell |
b
Sewell |
14 |
| T.
Wasson |
|
b
Shalders |
1 |
| A.H.
Back |
|
b
Thompson |
5 |
| Porrett |
Not |
Out |
0 |
|
Extras |
(wides
10) |
|
13 |
| Total |
|
|
83 |
Another notable
feature of the above is that it provides the first reported
appearance for Hethersett of the Guntons or at least two of them
- Frederick and William. The third - Edward- had yet to appear.
Whatever their original links with Hethersett, if indeed any, by
the 1870s they were domiciled at Costessey, brickmaking,
carpentry and the keeping of the Red Lion occupying their varied
attentions. Hethersett, because of its geographical location,
had long been the focal point for neighbourhood activities. Its
cricket likewise earned the attention of would be players and,
as we are told, "there was always plenty of fellows wanting
to play for the club - if they were good enough and got the
chance." Meanwhile the club itself indulged no narrow
parochialism when electing its members and players. For example
Jim Porrett was a farmer of Great Melton and Cleveland, an
erstwhile stalwart of the Wymondham club, found a place in the
Hethersett team. Yet there was no lack of home talent which
included Mr Rotherham, master of the village school. Nor was
there likely to be when, from all accounts all the males of
Hethersett were what would now be described as
"hooked" on cricket.
On May 30th, 1867
Hethersett met Norfolk and Norwich Club in a match which, though
it proved inconclusive (being presumably "rained
off"), reflected small credit upon the former.
Norwich Mercury,
June 8th, 1867
NORFOLK AND NORWICH
CLUB V HETHERSETT
A match was
played between these clubs on the 30th day with the following
results:
Norfolk and
Norwich Club First Innings
| F.
Brown |
|
b
E. Gunton |
3 |
| S.P
Beare |
Run |
Out |
4 |
| S.
Brown |
|
b
E. Gunton |
0 |
| C.R.
Wyman |
|
b
E. Gunton |
7 |
| H.G.
Barwell |
c
F. Gunton |
b
Bligh |
8 |
| P.C.
Day |
|
b
F. Gunton |
15 |
| H.
Drake |
|
|
2 |
| E.
Partridge |
Run |
Out |
2 |
| W.
Willett |
|
b
E. Gunton |
8 |
| Powell |
|
b
F. Gunton |
13 |
| D.H.
Abbott |
Not |
Out |
0 |
| Extras |
|
|
15 |
| Total |
|
|
77 |
Second Innings
| F.
Brown |
c
F. Gunton |
b
W. Gunton |
21 |
| S.
Beare |
Not |
Out |
8 |
| S.
Brown |
|
b
A. Bloomfield |
5 |
| C.
Wyman |
Not |
Out |
10 |
| H.
Barwell |
|
b
W. Gunton |
3 |
| P.
Day |
c
Cleveland |
b
Bloomfield |
8 |
| E.
Partridge |
|
b
W. Gunton |
6 |
| Powell |
|
b
W. Gunton |
26 |
| Extras |
|
|
7 |
| Total |
|
|
106 |
Hethersett
| W.
Gunton |
c
Barwell |
b
Beare |
4 |
| H.
Williams |
|
b
F. Brown |
0 |
| F.
Gunton |
|
|
7 |
| E.
Gunton |
c
Willett |
|
6 |
| Rotherham |
|
b
Beare |
1 |
| H.
Turner |
C
Abbott |
b
Brown |
4 |
| Blyth |
|
b
Beare |
0 |
| A.
Bloomfield |
|
|
0 |
| Cleveland |
Not |
Out |
0 |
| T.
Watson |
|
b
Beare |
3 |
| Porrett |
|
b
Brown |
0 |
| Extras |
|
|
4 |
| Total |
|
|
29 |
However, as the
season warmed up, Hethersett must have vastly improved its
performance cricket-wise. This we deduce from the report of a
match played against Barford, another village that appears early
in the annals of Norfolk cricket and of which was said: "Barford
were always reckoned to have a good cricket team."
Norwich Mercury 17th
August 1867
HETHERSETT v BARFORD
Played on Monday,
August 12th. Hethersett won the toss and batted. It will be
noted that the two Bloomfields (or Blomfields!) were in form on
that occasion, their combined scores more than covering the sum
of Barford's runs made in two innings.
Hethersett
| Dawson |
|
b
Rev Turner |
19 |
| Steedman |
|
Run
Out |
3 |
| H.
Bloomfield |
|
st
H. Turner |
100 |
| Back |
|
b
Blyth |
19 |
| W.
Watson |
|
b
Melton |
0 |
| A.
Bloomfield |
|
Not
Out |
58 |
| T.
Watson |
|
c
Master |
0 |
| Porritt |
|
b
Blyth |
3 |
| J.
Watson |
|
|
0 |
| Howell |
|
b
H. Turner |
8 |
| Melton |
|
b
Blyth |
0 |
|
|
Extras |
18 |
|
|
Total |
228 |
Barford First
Innings
| Lewis |
|
c
Howell |
3 |
| Blyth |
|
b
T. Watson |
0 |
| Melton |
|
b
A. Bloomfield |
1 |
| Hutcheons |
|
b
T. Watson |
4 |
| H.
Turner |
|
c
H. Bloomfield |
5 |
| Rev
Turner |
|
c
Dawson |
22 |
| Masters |
|
c
and b Watson |
13 |
| F.
Turner |
|
run
out |
0 |
| Penamn |
|
b
Back |
6 |
| Crack |
|
b
Back |
0 |
| Hicks |
|
not
out |
0 |
|
|
Extras |
18 |
|
|
Total |
72 |
Barford Second
Innings
| Lewis |
|
not
out |
8 |
| Blyth |
|
not
out |
16 |
| Hutcheons |
|
b
Bloomfield |
6 |
| H.
Turner |
|
c
and b Watson |
3 |
| Masters |
|
b
Bloomfield |
2 |
| F.
Turner |
|
b
Watson |
0 |
| Crack |
|
c
and b Watson |
1 |
| Hicks |
|
run
out |
0 |
|
|
Extras |
5 |
|
|
Total |
41 |